>>56306529Streaming has always been an expensive ''career'' anon. this also goes to any content creation job that require rendering and editing video + need to play high spec vidya
>i doubt anyone who is not a big fan would do iti mean that also goes to any job, honestly as long the company and the talent doesn't have crazy expectation it should be fine.
if the chuuba is poor they can still stream through laptop or cheap-mid PC, the downside is they can't stream high spec game.
but not like most chuuba stream high spec game anyway.
>commisioning model and rigger is not cheapyeah if you're indie or small corpo jadi-jadian unless you're sultan. but for proper company/agency it still cheap.
I'm more curious with how they handle perms tho, do they follow nip corpo autism or not.
>they use the money they get from the girls to subsidized their activity.How much? even if they use the girl's money, the number wouldn't be that significant to the point of making the entire company go red or kill the entire company. Because AFAIK most stars project (like 3D live, song, etc) still from their talents' pocket money. I think Cover still operate homos like they're in small corpo & guessing most of the money from the girls are for marketing.
>>56307068>Their profit margin is significantly lower than even HoloID though.Because holoID despite many numbernigger call them ''flop'' and underperforming, they're still done miles better than your average corpo chuuba. The low tier holos still crème of the crop in this industry.
it's no secret people underestimating holoID because muh CCV & in deep with their numberfaggotry.
Also, not fair to compare them to the stars when holoID has 2 talent who got 1mil subs. one 2m, and the lowest subs holoID are around 500k~600k sub, CMIIW. Meanwhile, the biggest Holostars barely scraping 300k subs.
>>56308497>Kobokers taking down twitter doxxfagqrd? that sounds funny.
