>>56445104>It's a bit more than pinky promises with the looming threat of being sued.Have we seen anyone actually ever getting sued for that? (i.e. revealing that they were XYZ corpo vtuber previously)
Sure, you don't see talents doing that often (or at all) anyway, and you can assume from that there's NDA's and threats of suing keeping them mum, but I wonder how much of that is just a paper tiger, and if a talent actually did it, not much would happen (because for example it turned out you can't actually forbid an actor from talking about what her previous role was, so the whole lawsuit thing would just be an empty threat mostly).
I mean sure it's obvious why talents don't talk about their previous identities while they're IN a company, because then the company would just fire them and they'd rather like to stay in their job (and we have indeed seen companies fire talents for infractions that, while not directly as blatant as "talking about your other/previous identities on our stream", are similar enough a la leaking internals to third parties, violating nda's in private, etc.).
But after they were already out of the company? Is there any instance of a company suing a previous talent (specifically for this only, revealing her identity, and not just other random contract violation stuff) and actually winning that case? So that there is a reason and precedence for this being industry practice, and not just talents being cowed in fear of (empty) threats?
I can't really recall any cases like that from the top of my head, I'm sure some kuro corpos somewhere probably must've tried that before, but did it actually work?