>>5732622>When a series is doing poorlyThat makes no fucking sense. Series that are actually doing poorly arent worth adapting to anime, all adapted works are successful already in their own right and anime amplifies that success, but they've already beaten the competition among other works in the same medium, which wont get an adaptation.
It is success that makes an anime adaptation more likely - not failure.
A lot of anime has better art than manga - see demon slayer, jujutsu kaisen, attack on titan, any adaptation of really old works.
Also your terminology is shit. Better individual drawings doesnt mean its better "art", animation itself is art and manga has none. What the fuck is animation by yutaka nakamura, nozomu abe and other great animators, if not art?
. Having more lines in a single draving vs a single anime frame, isn't "better art". So that's just pure ignorant drivel
>needs extra bells and whistles to pay attentionits the opposite. You have problem with attention, if you cant appreciate additional aspects by artists over multiple disciplines - like voice acting, music and animation.
Thinking demonstrably dryer work is automatically better is idiotic.
Why even read manga then, do you need pretty pictures to "pay attention", read light novels and novels, they have more detail.
Authors like Isayama themselves consider anime the final product and often has added/changed content, but they are definitely not designed by producers or by directors to be an accessory.
Everyone knows that continuation of anime greatly depends on success of that adaptation. Similar in how an american TV series wont continue with poor ratings, and poor ratings of a manga can get it cancelled before it's adapted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRa-wtf5bkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfmAYf99A80