>>57811962True, but Japanese modern vocabulary is around 60% Chinese words, which implies the number of homonyms unimaginable for any European language.
In fact, you, an Eilnsgh seakper, taert Eislgnh wrods lkie kjani. Rmebemer that fmoaus txet wrhee eevy letetr of ecah word but the fsrit and the last are slcbremad, but you can stlil raed the txet petrflcey fine? I'ts bucseae you, a prfoniceit raeder, see wrods as a sulnge unit, not a ciolelcotn of letrtes, jsut like a Ceshnie wrod.
