>>5977467Supergiants streaming release is worthless. Go ahead and read it. The immediate obvious issues:
It explicitly says free or ad supported streams are fine. But superchats are not mentioned. Generally speaking if you delineate specific inclusions anything not mentioned is assumed to be excluded and at least becomes a grey area.
They also put a disclaimer that says they are free to change these terms at any time which is actually a huge landmine. What if they they get into a Twitter spat about something stupid and change the terms? They can literally change their disclaimer to anything. What happens to old videos? Are you now at risk for strikes?
If it goes to court what consideration did supergiant receive? Was there a true meeting of the minds? Does this count as a contract? No? Then we default back to statue and case law and Cover is turbo fucked.
From a corporate perspective Supergiant’s disclaimer is worse than useless. Blame the bizzare state of copyright law but legally it would provide basically no protection if they wanted to be dicks about it.
