>>6070671>>6070004>>6070049>>6070313>>6070364>>6070520>>6070501>>6070607>>6070655copywrite laws don't work like how this schitzo teammate thinks they do.
He took
1) ame's voice (without permission)
2) dr suess's written work (without permission)
3) someone else's music (without permission)
mixed them together and wanted to get paid. Copywrite law doesn't work like this. I can't take michael jackson's beat it, and set it to a reading of tom sawyer with morgan freedman reading it, and call it MY work and try to make money off it. it's just delusion. He needed all 3 parties permissions to make the work in the first place (meaning it could have been copywrite struck by any of 3 parties) and likely permission never would have been given for him to monitize it as well.
This dude is a certifiable schitzo who thinks he's entitled to youtube bucks. just stop giving him a platform.
>>6071050>Then hip hop can't exist. What Holobass did is the essence of the hip hop scene, i.e. samplingno, sampling is allowed in 2 situations. depending on how it's sampled. if the music track is ripped without alteration they need permission from the composer to sample, which they usually can get if they agree to profit share or it's old enough or they're part of the same record company, or their friends. The other situation is if they TRANSOFORM the music into something else, by changing the beat or increasing the tempo, or changing the instruments. Copywrite is sorta loose about musical plagiarism, it doesn't take a lot of change to a peice of music to skirt plagiarism charges (a good example of someone who didn't originally get permission to sample, is vanilla ice's "ice ice baby" which sampled "under pressure" form Queen/david bowe without permission or significant enough transformation, as a result he had to reach an agreement with both artists for an undisclosed amount of $$ to keep rights to the song and avoid court)
