>>6437374>Depends on your definition of normie... there's a significant minorityThat's it. It's not common, and this minority are the normies that end up becoming newfags and whatnot.
>Historically, men seem to be pretty flexibleThat's true, we will fuck anything provided it doesn't cut our dicks off.
Also, I don't think your definition of bisexuality distinguishes between attraction and act.
Male gay sex happened in the past as a symbol of power, authority, status or humiliation of enemies, not love. And provided the birth control of that era was almost useless, it was the safest choice to fuck inferior men instead.
>Ovid is one of the few Romans who bothers to comment on lesbianism and describes it as "unheard of.">as the marriage draws ever closer, Iphis recoils, calling her love "monstrous and unheard of"It happened in Sumer, Egypt, and everywhere else, it just was less recorded because history focused on men.
Culture was also significant, as a man deviating a little from expectations and roles wasn't too big of a deal, but a woman was unacceptable. In roman culture in particular, pederasty was viewed in good light for the reasons mentioned in the previous quote, lesbianism wasn't.
>Seneca the Elder mentions a husband who killed his wife and her female lover and implies that their crime was worse than that of adultery between a male and female>The Babyloniaca of Iamblichus describes an Egyptian princess named Berenice who loves and marries another woman. This novelist also states that such love is "wild and lawless".>Her friend Leaena comments that "They say there are women like that in Lesbos, with faces like men, and unwilling to consort with men, but only with women, as though they themselves were men". Megillus seduces Leaena, who feels that the experience is too disgusting to describe in detail. It was known and suppressed, but not often told.
