>>64509575Anon, you are sorely misunderstanding the nature of the criticism. People in this blessed thread has zero problem with sexual explicit content, going by how much they rave about the "sprinkler" AVtuber girl.
What peeves most people (and get them to brand a segment of people as "coomers") is
>trying to inject promiscuous behavour in a context it does not belongOne of the LEAST criticized ENVtubers in this board, despite being active since 2020 at very least, happens to be
>Projekt MelodyShe's a sex worker, she sells sexually explicit content for a living. People here couldn't care less and might even be her customers.
Most of the criticism is about thots trying to inject sexually explicit content in platforms where it is not meant to exist, and about the admins of said platforms SELECTIVELY allowing it to happen.
There are stuff on Youtube that would get a vtuber girl banned IMMEDIATELY if she tried, but Youtube turns a blind eye because "empowerment" or some other retarded current thing
