>>64579214>>64579367I know what you mean but there’s a lot of discrepancy here. It’s essentially that the person wirh the bigger investment loses, which is kinda fucked up, but that’s why it just can’t work out unless both parties don’t know of another.
If you’re the boyfriend then you could see it as you being the chad doing the cucking, however, your girlfriend still is spreading her asshole and pussy to random strangers online even if they don’t penetrate her. I mean that’s what we used to call sexting, and that is absolutely more than flirty and you would definitely find more than a little questionable in other contexts too.
On the other hand if you’re the fan you could just say you’re paying to jerk off, because you want her content specific or whatever, the why is irrelevant for now. You could however also just look pathetic paying your money to see some women’s naked body that you’ll never touch when she has a boyfriend that does and for free.
It is a light form of prostitution, even if the parties don’t meet, she’s literally selling her body for money. And it’s the same philosophy as those apply that manage to date a prostitute.
In a way, both are cucks because neither can truly "dominate" the other, they’re playing two completely different games with different objectives. At the core is the girl that is the problem epicenter essentially. It’s something the boyfriend needs to come to terms with somehow and something the fans preferably don’t see or at least ignore.