>>65521114>He's missing a "lack of one" or similar end to his sentence.He is and yet every native speaker knows what he means and can imagine someone saying that incomplete sentence out loud.
>Nobody who isn't cringe omits natural speech like that, so I'm hoping he's ESL for his sake.You either cringe at 90% of the population on a regular basis or you're not a native speaker and are hyper focused on what seem like illogical mistakes. It's just a product of natural language and people being lazy with the familiar.
>Checking your other replies it seems you don't really watch their content.I do, I just don't watch all of it.
>You close a stream if it's not interesting to you.Should I sit through it instead? Maybe you want me to seethe through it bored and then make a thread ranting about how I didn't enjoy it even though I knew I wouldn't. Considering how most anons behave I bet that's what you actually want.
>Just don't be surprised when you write a stupid opinionAll opinions are stupid. Your opinions are stupid too, there are many anons that will read your posts and think you're the dumbest anon on the planet. Get used to it.
>when you aren't knowledgeable about the thing you're criticizing.I am knowledgeable. I do not need to watch all of their content to know what kind of content they make. Someone can watch only 10 episodes of FuwaMoco Morning and make a more informed assessment of it than someone that watched all 61 episodes.
>based on content which you literally haven't watchedBut we already agreed that this is incorrect. Most anons have probably watched many hours of their content which is more than enough to give a well informed assessment of them, how they make content, their target audience, and what might put off potential viewers. In total most people commenting have probably watched more hours of their content than they put out in the first week or month.
