[13 / 2 / 10]
Quoted By: >>68451330
One must adhere to these rules:
1: All rrats are true unless proven otherwise.
2: Rrats don't need to be proven, they're automatically true.
3: If someone asks for a source point out to the first two rules.
4: Rrat can only disproven by the following:
a) Verifiable source disproves rrat. If there is more than one party involved in rrat, the verification must come from all parties involved plus third independent party.
b) Forensic, DNA and fingertip analysis makes likelihood of rrat being true unlikely.
5: If rrat is against Mikeneko or Nijisanji only God Almighty has the power and authority to rebut.
1: All rrats are true unless proven otherwise.
2: Rrats don't need to be proven, they're automatically true.
3: If someone asks for a source point out to the first two rules.
4: Rrat can only disproven by the following:
a) Verifiable source disproves rrat. If there is more than one party involved in rrat, the verification must come from all parties involved plus third independent party.
b) Forensic, DNA and fingertip analysis makes likelihood of rrat being true unlikely.
5: If rrat is against Mikeneko or Nijisanji only God Almighty has the power and authority to rebut.
