>>6939741Yes; because at the end of the day, you are still trapped in a merely relational, relative, and reactive frame, and not a self-sufficient, aristocratic frame capable of grasping higher teleologies, thus generating it's own motivations, and thus in possession of the sort of agency that serves as the 'prime mover' for herds of other merely relational beings, one way or another.
>If master morality is sentiment, then slave morality is re-sentiment; devaluing that which the master values and the slave does not have. 
