>>70707606You know you're just repeating my points right?
>at least not having previous gens throw shade at them would have worked better for kawaiikawaii was on the defense and any rebuttal or act of denying the accusations from the public is considered throwing shade. Like I said, the act of defending is considered bad meaning gen 3 won.
>Gen 3 didn't respond to that stream and, as far as I know, never said anything bad about the remaining talents. They ended up looking more professional.Like I said before, they didn't need to because they knew how to play the game. Why say anything when you can make the public create narratives to help your case? If gen 3 never said anything then why did the public conclude that kawaii and the talents were the bad people? What did the public base their conclusions on? See how this works now?
I don't know why in the vtubing sphere people think ignoring accusations is the "correct" way to handle things when that isn't how it works. Add in the primitive logic of, if you deny something then you are actually guilty of it then it just gets a bit pathetic.
It's the same tactic people use nowadays. Someone accuses you of being racist and you deny it but because you deny it you are actually racist. Only a racist would deny being a racist. Yes, I'm not making that up.
