>>7098780>260calso, less than a packet of instant ramen. what was the issue here?
>263g sugar>ice cream, cookies, and chocolate syrup heaped together in a large cuphow precisely is that suprising? yes, that teakettle vtuber is gonna give herself diabetes if she's having them daily as the rrats claim, especially if the rest of her diet isn't low-to-no sugar. but why exactly is it suprising that something meant as a periodic indulgence is, in fact, unhealthy, and something you shouldn't be living on?
I think it's a bigger wtf that there are people in this world who don't understand the idea of something you're not meant to treat as the centerpiece of one's daily diet. both in terms of actually being dumb enough to take a "once a month" item and spam it, and in terms of those who see the "once a month" item and assume it's meant to be spammed.
