>>73358836You're the only one arguing in bad faith because you're applying a faulty framework of context for straight men wearing gay/womens clothes to be within the same vein of logic as a straight woman wearing straight woman clothes.
Just because they both need context doesn't mean that the levels of context required are the same or even require the same type of vein of reasoning
To even make the distinction of Geralt and Ookami with
>it's just an extreme example on why a sexualized character needs to make sense in the context of the world.is just super bad faith and disingenuous because you're ultimate point was about context when you know for a fact the context for them or a woman wearing those clothes are so massively different and nuanced it has no bearing on anything
>sling bikinis are not even exclusively "woman clothes"And a man can wear thongs to, dresses as well, guess there's no such thing as womans clothes huh?
Yeah let's just be super trivial and reduce everything to having no meaning and everything is everything and specifics don't matter
