>>7433895Not how copyright works. You don't have to 'apply' for it, you have it by default for anything you can prove you created. You realise a common thing amongst musicians for example is simply mailing yourself a copy of the song/lyrics and keeping it unopened, right? This is because it proves you created it at this date, and thus courts will hand all rights to it to you in any legal case happily.
Why do you post when you do not know anything about copyright and have never once had to interact with it?
>>7433927Listen retard, the song has multiple music tracks. It has drums, synth, effects, all of which are original and the dude created. He owns the rights retard, just because you put someones voice over it doesn't change that.
Ame's performance probably wouldn't fall under fair use there honestly in any court, but that's irrelevant because that's not what he's even talking about and he's fine with it lol. Ame performing the song =/= cover copyright claiming songs and videos on spotify etc dumbass.
>>7433966Yeah they don't know shit about copyright, I'm impressed he linked something that specifically argues against his own claim though
