>>76817356>>76817643Size 2x on the overcoat is criminal. The $250 is just the cherry on top for bad value.
I didn't check the watch band size; but I doubt I could wear it either.
>>76817695Not fat, just too tall with too broad of shoulders. I'm 6'3" so even if I had a narrow frame and my shoulders fit, the sleeves would cut off at my forearm.
Size chart wise, their 2X also seems closer to an American XL. At least if you're basing it on Jacket sizing which should be one step up from your normal sizing to accommodate the clothing you wear. That's pretty standard when you first go to try on suits at least.
