>>77424170>From a moral argument standpoint that wouldn't matter since if it was wrong to do this to a 1 view, it would be just as wrong to do it to a 5 viewIt wouldn't be wrong to sue a 1view, because she is in the right, simply the costs and cons heavily outweigh the pros, so from an economical point of view it doesn't make sense. That one twitter lawyer said she would have a strong case. IANAL, so I'll take his word for it.
>>77425078>articulate a moral principleRespecting the property of others, including intellectual property, is one of the examples of absolute moral principles.
The plagiarism that Lola commits is a form of intellectual theft. It is generally accepted that theft is morally wrong, unless you do it for a higher purpose, such as saving a life. I can't be convinced that plagiarism is morally correct in this case.
It's also disrespectful to the artist's work and creativity, but you said you don't care how people feel. It's a moral principle of most people to be fair, kind, and respectful to others, though.
Any artistic work gives the creator the so-called “Moral Rights”. What protections it guarantees varies between countries. They don't equal Economic rights, like copyright, but you asked only about morality.
