>>78121378>Not that anon but I do think there's a point to having them easily accessible on YT. Normalfags are usually clueless about how to-I understand your point and clearly so did Cover because that anon was allowed to just chug along even with videos on the millions of views without being bothered.
There is an extra danger on allowing to do that, and it’s amusingly the reason Cover has a “moratorium” on clipping streams that still didn’t finish: YouTube hits channels REALLY hard for “reused content”
>see Sushi, Sashimi and other clippers that went from hundreds of thousands of views to low thousands When Youtube deem your channel a “low value reposter” it’s as good as dead and YouTube isn’t smart enough to determine which channel has the original video and which channel had the reposts, they just strike everybody posting the same stuff and boot them from the algo.
