>>79950867Well, first, why actively violate licenses for products and have to go through lawsuits and lawyer fees and cut away significant portions of your profits when you could just... NOT do that? Why would I use a font I know is in violation of the license I purchased it under when I could just use a different font that doesn't have that problem?
And if you're saying that, well, it would make sense if you decide to violate a really BIG IP, a company like Disney can sue you right into the fucking dirt for well beyond even the original revenue of the product, but for damages well beyond that. In your theoretical example, Disney could claim damages not just from the sale of the product but damages directly to the integrity of their IP and brand(s) and copyright violations and I could find myself millions of dollars in the hole for it.
In these cases, like this case with Filian, we're usually talking a small individual creator having a license violated by a larger corporation, not the reverse.
