>>79964352Ignorance and dismissal are a great strategy on an anonymous image board, but not sound legal advice when you violate contract law.
Filian's model is a Rindo derivative-- the defense that Rindo is a 'generic catgirl' doesn't prevent it from being a specific, clearly evident and-- as it happens-- actually provable original model. Rindo has a license for what it can and can't be used for. Violations to that license are actionable.
I suspect an amicable resolution will be made between all parties, either in the form of an agreement or a settlement to make the complaint disappear, but the violation is clear and no amount of 'it's just a random catgirl' cope will change that.