>>80064686>deplatformedI know we say "lurk moar" a lot, but really, you should if you want to try to convince people. Besides your obvious ESL ("at least sued to the oblivion" should read "at least be sued into oblivion"), because you can't exactly "deplatform" someone on 4chan, people on 4chan don't care about "deplatforming."
She's 100% doing herself a favor by not making any public statements; Twitter-brained cancel-culture types (You) would just use that to continue the attack. Without more ammunition, in the form of people with actual platforms saying anything or anyone involved saying anything, the only thing you can do is try to bring up more drama--stale drama doesn't move the catalog, after all. I suppose that's why this thread focuses on a "fraud" angle. Now, I can tell you without even reading any of the Tweets that she hasn't committed fraud--even if some of the purchasers thought that they were buying a plush toy of someone else, that is their fault for not reading the label on the plush toy which they were purchasing. Another clear indication that you're not actually concerned--and especially that you're just a cancel-culture type--is that you post "evidence" to support your post, which "evidence" is a screenshot of a Tweet with screenshots of other Tweets, all in Japanese. So, either you know Japanese and Tagalog (which would be an impressive feat for your IQ level), or you got your evidence from someone else and have just passed it along. The idea of ascribing guilt because someone else told you that evidence you can't understand (or don't bother to understand) is characteristic of people who lack the critical thinking skills to evaluate evidence in their own right. This thinking is seen in the VTubing community most often in Nijisisters, but a lot of the nu-anime bleed-through SJW "safe space" VTubers -- sorry, "TBA" VTweeters -- have the same ideas. In short, "deplatforming", really? Get better content. sage
