>>80498349>It's only ambiguous for someone that's new that wasn't around back then. But you should have been able to pick up what I meant from the context of the discussion. For brevity's sake, I was referring to the way she ghosts us.Nice try, but I fully understood that that's what you were getting at, and the fact is that describing what she's doing now as the "same things" is still deceptively ambiguous. Why? Because you could only argue she's "doing the same thing" if you conveniently ignore the LENGTHS OF TIME for which she's been doing them - which is the crux of the issue, because two weeks of ghosting is not comparable to four+ months of ghosting. Hence why it is an improvement, which you are trying to pretend it's not, because apparently all ghosting is created equal (as you state explicitly further in your post).
>When was this?You would know if you've been around back then.
>When did she stop?Gee, I dunno - for the periods she's been streaming inbetween aaaaaall of the examples that you just gave, and even during those periods considering the ? Which ties back in to my earlier point that she's not actually "doing the same thing" at all, due to the fact that she's been ghosting for shorter and shorter periods progressively throughout the whole year, hence your obsession with ignoring duration as a factor?
>Or maybe you're position is that she's ghosting us for weeks instead of months (except for those three separate months she did), which I suppose IS an improvement over multiple months of ghosting, but it's still ghosting.Thank you for acknowledging that you're doing exactly what I've been accusing you of doing.
>She hasn't stopped.Except for every single time she stops ghosting us. And again - that's only if you ignore time scales. She has yet to ghost us nearly as badly, nor for as long, as she had in the latter half of 2023.
>You can say this year is better than the end of last year, but now we're just arguing about time scales.As though time scales aren't the critical factor in determining an improvement.
>What I will say is that if someone's memory was especially bad and he could only remember two days at a time, then he too would think that she was making incredible improvements any time she made a single tweet, but only because the previous day there was nothing at all.He would actually think this more, proportionally to how far back his memory goes. Because then he could think back to late 2023 and compare it to now, and realize that she has, indeed, improved significantly.