>>81518617>that could be considered successful "ligger" tier.The fact every talk of male vtuber success has to be “relativized” is more evidence in the general point I’m making, which is
>every male vtuber so far, starting from the very top, is a less performing less successful version of their direct counterparts in the non vtuber content creator world Take Kuzuha and Shaka (for two content creators that do more or less the same thing) and you can go down from that, in every single instance the one behind an anime avatar is taking a 40%, 50%, 80% debuff in every metric even if the content they’re creating is very similar.
The reason for that is simple to explain too: neither heterosexual men nor well adjusted women have any desire to watch a grown man pretending to be an anime catboy, specially when they can get no shortage of content creators putting out the exact same content with or without their faces on screen.
There is no market for male vtubers outside of homosexual men, promiscuous women and male to female transsexuals mostly because the content they want cannot be performed by regular content creators unless they hide their identity behind an avatar.
Other than that, there is no shortage of content creators providing what male vtubers would, but without the “anime avatar” debuff.
And every company making a bet on the opposite direction lost so far, landing square on their faces and, in the cases of the ones with females in their branch, dragging them to the hole as well.