>>82940263This thread once again shows how you have to arbitrarily restrict or expand your definitions (of red in this case) to exclude and eliminate people on such generalizations. It's always the same disingenuous argumentation, same as people changing the list of best performing vtubers to put their oshi at the top by making definitions that selectively exclude others.
It's not about what they mean with this, it's about you you mean by this and that's pretty transparent.
