>>83360599wtf is this logic
why are so many drones trying so hard to defend holo that they twist how things are in the business world?
companies don't. fucking. care.
if you still benefit them more in the company than out given your breach they'll keep you
they might tank your pay for a couple months, but they're looking for their own interests
the public won't know about the nda breach either unless they company wants to remove you and wants
to give a reason to the public
This imaginary holiness or magical power that you attach to nda agreements is merely your headcannon
nda agreements give companies more legal power not less, otherwise what's the point of it?
>>83355317she could have disclosed something to a third party that includes protected info(somebody's medical records for example)
so in that sense, the third party shouldn't have known and now knows said records, but still it is illegal for them to publish this newly gained knowledge
