>>84803525For that to happen, Mouse would have to let's say "reacted' to the same video over more than 3 times or in 3 different videos she reacted to something legally owned by the same company holder, considering there are 3 strikes, it had also meant that the copyright holder, took it upon to search every single video in search for the usage of the video, and not only that, it would have meant that the copyright holder also puts this claim over that the content in its majority was about that video to reach into the third strike and channel termination (bear in mind, claims can exist, and claims can more easily dispute over channel stirkes and the fact that you can edit certain things out), which would be absurd considering it's a full vod with more content. IT would be hard to really find who that is, which is why it's assumed to be malicious, because you can easily be the representative of various video holders and do that.
Now, let's assume it's a legit copyright holder, now if what I said is true, there's also other content you could strike them for. One of the most known one, it's games, such as the case of the Holocaust, which was partially due to copyright holders of the games striking down videos of the Hololive girls playing different games, which could also be the case as said before with that example, because a game could easily be in 3 videos, and it can the main content of those 3 videos, and it could also be a case of indie videogames,
>picrelIs of a case of a malicious attempt by using Toby Fox's name and people taking advantage to the point he had to come out and say that it wasn't him
https://x.com/UnderTale/status/1538229353913384961The other one, would be also the IRLs, but considering she had permissions to record, this also kinda enters into the malicious attempt, because the only one I could think off would be the IRL to Disneyland, which Disney (while evil) can easily be disputed actually.
