>>86435540While the referral system in the Snack Pack program shares some surface similarities with the structure of a pyramid scheme (e.g., earning bonuses for referring others), it's important to distinguish between the two.
Key Differences:
Legitimacy of Product/Service: Pyramid schemes typically don't involve a real product or service, or they only use them as a front to recruit more people. In contrast, the Snack Pack program appears to be focused on generating content (clips) that have real value. People are paid based on the views their clips generate, not just for recruiting others.
Earnings Based on Performance: In this program, clippers are still primarily earning money based on the views they get from their own work (content creation). The bonus for referrals (5% of views) is small and is tied to the success of the person referred. It doesn’t rely solely on recruitment, as a pyramid scheme would.
No Upfront Investment Required: Pyramid schemes typically require participants to buy into the system or pay upfront fees, whereas this program doesn’t seem to involve any payment to join or participate—just the creation and sharing of content.
Sustainable Incentives: In this case, the incentive structure encourages content creation, which drives actual engagement and viewership, rather than focusing on endlessly recruiting new participants to generate income.
In summary, based on what you’ve shared, the Snack Pack program seems to be a referral-based content creation system rather than a pyramid scheme. The key factor is that the focus remains on content creation and earning money through that work, not just recruiting others.
