>>86588602sexual norms here are totally inverted and self-contradicting in all ways.
children understand their sexuality enough to consent to life changing measures,
but women's capacity to consent to sex itself is still problematized well beyond 18,
but all kinds of open lewdness and perversion by real persons ought to be forcefully accepted,
but fictional characters in art need to be socially policed under nigh puritanical constraints,
but epstein is basically used as a joke indicating that these people aren't actually taking themselves seriously,
but sexual assault is the worst thing ever,
but it is openly denied that clothing choices could possibly be intended to arouse men,
on and on it goes.
having any actually consistent ideological position against this schizophrenic background radiation requires you to bite so many bullets you end up the worst kind of person of all: "weird".
