>>86795512No, you did. I simply replied. And shame on the first anon you responded to as well.
> reporting on what someone said isn't propagandaWhen it's the way that those articles and the media in general reports on these things these days, it is. But sure. Go ahead and believe it. I'm sure you believe the bloodbath comment too that the propaganda media machine was spewing. Because if they say it, it must be true.
>now was it?Well, I certainly remember cities being destroyed when a fentanyl addict died for months on end with looting and rioting. I'm sure this will also be mostly peaceful if your side loses.
Anyway, why seethe about politics on /vt/?
