>>86946614The only thing she denied was shagging her manager. And even if they weren't actually fucking, there was still the appearance of him giving her preferential treatment in exchange for sexual favors, so Idol couldn't not fire him (and as
>>86953358 said, they couldn't not disclose this in the termination notice)
As for the other things, she didn't really "deny" the allegations as such, she merely insisted that it wasn't nearly as bad as the company made those things out to be - i.e. she only takes prescription medication, she didn't require her fans to pay her money in order to have sex with her, and vtubers getting gifts from their fans is perfectly normal. Her argument is that she did nothing morally wrong, which I agree with. But Idol was still (at least legally) justified in firing her:
>pretending that she would take drugs in exchange for donos is not something they could afford to tolerate, even if the drugs were prescription drugs that she was gonna take regardless of donos>meeting up with fans in a hotel behind management's back (or potentially with the approval of the manager they ended up firing) is also bonk-worthy; even if they knew about it for months and were able to pretend not to know up to that point in time, once they lost that plausible deniability they were forced to either expressly prohibit it or expressly permit it> > permitting it could open them up to being criminally charged with doing unlicensed sex work, depending on how prudish the local prosecutor is> > and even if they prohibited it but she did it anyway, one sufficiently unhinged fan would have been the difference between a termination notice and an obituary>accepting gifts from fans, in and of itself, is fine. Accepting gifts valuable enough to count as taxable income, without reporting those gifts to the company's accountants, is not finetldr Riro Ron did nothing morally wrong in being a menhera cumslut, and Idol did nothing legally wrong in firing her for getting drugs and money involved in her sluttery
