>>8743666>Hahaha! You're actually copy pasting now?I'm not sure what you /think/ I'm copy pasting, but yes, you got me, I had to look up how to spell "Sinaitic", and copy-pasted it because I couldn't be arsed typing it out. I did it again just now.
>Meanwhile I have posted scholarly sources. You've posted images without citations
>You have been seething that vikangz are losersI just like reading about languages, and I'm pointing out where you're incorrect.
>Your God is a Turk roach cum Slurper.Pagans are LARPers, and I'm an atheist, so if you think this bothers me, I have some unfortunate news for you.
>How does that feel about that?Well, I feel good that I'm not ESL like you've just shown here, so doing pretty well, actually, thanks for asking.
>>Old Norse is literally a pictographic languagePlease provide evidence for your claim, show me a table mapping the symbols to the concepts they represent. Without this, you have no basis for this claim. The other anon is correct, they are derived from some of the older italic runic writing systems, which were themselves likely derived from the phoneticians, which were themselves derived from the proto-sinaitic system I mentioned further, which were finally pictographic.
You really are out of your depth.
