The reason why only INA is out is that INA only has contracts with other Japanese companies, and I suspect that it is easy for them to have incomplete documentation, such as income declaration.
The fact that the performer provides a Japanese publisher with illustrations for a novel or something like that is not work with the cover company.
Wouldn't he have to submit labour documents to the immigration authorities for ‘all the Japanese companies with which he had a labour contract’?
The other EN members do not have to deal with ‘all Japanese companies except Cover Inc’, so Cover Inc has all the documents for income declaration, so no incomplete paperwork can occur.
This is my guess.
Translated with
DeepL.com (free version)
inaだけアウトな理由はinaだけ日本の他企業とも契約していて、収入申告とかの書類に不備が生じやすいんだろうと私は思う。
演者が日本の出版社に小説の挿絵とか提供している事はカバー社との仕事ではない。
「労働契約した日本の企業の全て」の労働書類を入国管理局に出す必要があるのだろう?
他のenメンバーは「カバー社以外の日本の企業」と取引がないから収入申告の書類のすべてをカバー社は所持しているために、書類不備が起きない。
これが私の推測。
