>>88149638Close, but not quite.
Here's the summary for Case 1:
>On April 8, 2022, Cover ordered one subcontractor to create a 2D model for video use, and after receiving payment on the 18th of the same month, Cover had the subcontractor redo the work seven times free of charge between then and September 15, 2022, even though the specifications and other information in the purchase order did not indicate that work was necessary.>Three of the seven redoes were done after the inspection period, which was set to within seven business days after delivery. Two of the three redoes were done after July 11, 2022, when Cover notified the subcontractor that the model was "completed," because a VTuber who uses the 2D model for video created under this order wanted to make corrections. Cover continued to neglect accounting procedures, and the subcontractor's payment for this order was not made until December 27, 2023, 619 days after the receipt of payment on April 18, 2022.So the order of event is:
April 8 2022, rigging delivered
Somewhere between April 8 to 18, Cover asked for FOUR revisions which was not included in the scope of initial Purchase Order, and they weren't paying for it.
April 18 2022, the receipt date for this job, but Cover didn't pay yet.
Sometime after April 18 2022, Cover asked for ONE more revision even though it's already outside the inspection period agreed by both parties, and of course they didn't pay for it.
July 11 2022, Cover gave the final OK for the job.
Sometime between July 11 2022 to September 15 2022, Cover somehow asked for TWO more revisions even though they were the one giving the OK because the Vtuber wasn't satisfied by it, and this time they also weren't paying.
December 27 2023, Cover finally paid for the job without any compensation for the 7 revisions.
