>>89723621>OllieOllie. Also playing into the whole anonymous partner thing. If you picture someone in particular knocking her out that's YOUR fantasy.
>RissaGood job proving my point about not directly showing/saying stuff by talking about something she (in your own words) referenced.
>>89723862Still not getting the difference between "Hot art of them in a sexual scenario with no defined male" and "Mitri naked and rubbing his unseen-because-SFW-rules peen on her" (Not even an exageration it's LITERALLY the last post on his account before the one she replied to).
>>89724062Good. Glad we as a community can agree on and accept the progression from "She can retweet shipping art of them because he's her confort character" to "she can retweet porn of them on her main as long as it isn't TOO explicit because she really likes him". I'm sure that you'll also support the next step on the ladder since there are accepted examples of already right?
Last post I make about the whole thing since it's surprising peaceful rn and I'm sure we'll time to discuss this over the break. For the record; Whatever sister comes out of the trash can and impersonates me to continue the argument is italian and I'm playing Mario & Luigi Brotherhood.
