>>90197096>I doubt the line is at the best place it can be, for one thing. I'm just fairly sure that tossing away bunches of people who add more labor than they take back in benefits won't result in some kind of utopia.So you argument is "I don't know anything. But I am certain of this."
Then you strawman my argument saying I am arguing for utopia when I never said that.
> Clearly we disagree on this and since neither of us will pull facts or numbers from anywhere aside from our asses this end may as well be dropped.Nigger, this is basic fucking economics. I don't need a fucking paper to tell you that when labor supply goes up, wage demand goes fucking down.
>Equitable and fair for who, exactly?For everyone competing in the American labor market.
>If you mean for all the system is so rigged against that that you may as well quit talkingAgain, strawmanning shit I never said.
>There must be poor.More strawmanning shit I never said.
> It's in the nature of the wealthy to ensure a massive group beneath them to prop up their lives.More strawmanning shit I never said.
>How poor is too poor is a question just as valid as how rich is too rich if this is the discussion.Not a point I ever raised.
>You seem convinced I'm not poor for some reason. I'm not starving, but I'm far from well off. Oh hey, just checked. I'm only about $1K above the poverty line. Neat!Okay then you're just objectively retarded and acting against your own self interest and the interest of a more fair and equitable society.
You for some reason think that illegal immigration is good for the poor jobs, fucking over your own earning potential. But then don't believe that the rich people's job should be subject to the same labor competition ensuring that you stay locked out of them since your conditions won't improve since the illegal immigrants are making it more difficult to earn money and thus reducing your own social mobility.
