>>91382187Shitposting aside, views over time, along with the CCV "equivalent" of views/duration, would be good metrics
Not for horseracing but as measures of success
Could even split between "long" and "short" views like viewstats does
Problem is that it isn't easy, there's no website for this, so you gotta do the data collection and analysis yourself
There was an anon here last year or so that said he was working on it, but he either left or abandoned the effort
