>>92030413>I repeated this point because I am throwing this exact point at you. You're threatening violence.Of which it doesn't make sense because I'm not the one with a pathological hatred towards the objective historical fact that humans did believe in creationism and the flat earth and that teaching that fact is harmless. That would be you because you have a political agenda against another group and want to deny them power.
>So what's your alternative? Teach everything? Have everything be in the classroom? Teach as much as you reasonably can, pausing on the sections that are most important to understand as part of a happy life.
>Thats as retarded as saying sex education should be taught to toddlers.. Yes, I am saying you are just as bad. You should be shot.But you don't believe in violence, are you backtracking?
>I thought you said you were a centrist?I am a centrist. Do you think being a centrist means that I play diplomat between left and right? I think you both need to be thrown in a fucking ditch a shot because you can't get past your own egos to help others.
>And why do you call left-leaning ideals a cult? Simply because you disagree with them?Censorship for the sake a political agenda makes you a cult.
>And I think you're politically motivated to be a contrarian AND a retard. And no, your violence won't solve anything.This is based on absolutely nothing and is a lie that you just made up for convenience to other me. Yours is based on a hatred of Christian Nationalists which you have openly stated multiple times.
>Which they do. Within a page. But you seem to be arguing for more.Literally did not once state that and again it's just shit you made up in your head because of your political agenda. This is why you are actually a dangerous person, without even stating anything of the sort, you have already tried to other me and just put words in the mouth for no reason other than you dislike me personally.
>I think it should be lessened.To zero, which is censorship of objective history because of political agenda. That is dangerous and actively detracts from the quality of life of human beings. Trying to actively make people's lives worse because your agenda means you need to die if you will not change.
>But I'm not going to go and threaten violence about that fact, retard.You are, inherently. The state is a monopolised violence apparatus and you expect the state to enforce the curriculum you want. The state does this ultimately through violence.
>Just like you are. For a person who claims to be centrist, you seem so ready to argue for a right leaning sideAlmost like it's because you're a leftist and so I'm arguing against you and not someone on the right but because of your political agenda and your desire to other me, you feel a need to put me into the right-wing camp.
>And I will call you a retard for threatening violence on me simply because I disagree with you.You don't just disagree with me, you're willing to attempt to enforce your views over mine with violence through the state apparatus.
>Can we both be grown ups and agree that sex education should not be taught to toddlers? Or do you think that is "censorship"?We already went through this.
