>>94161208>t's a line from Eccelstiastes, one of the most famous books ever written.Okay, and? What's important about this book? Why is this book objectively correct? Why should I personally care about this book in terms of my relationships to women?
>ou could have just searched that quote on the internet and it would have immediately brought you to the passage.I'm not doing your homework for you cuck
>If someone has a problem that 99.999% the same as me, I'm not going to have an autistic fit about the difference.And yet, here you are being upset that people view relationships differently from you
>I'm not your fucking teacher.But you seem really certain that other people should live like you, so go ahead and teach me your ways, you fucking coward
>f you cannot figure out why the gift of life or why bringing new life into the world isn't a good thing, you are fundamentally defective as a person."This thing is true just because it is"
lmao
>You are not a newborn who has never encountered these ideas before, you're a fully grown man pretending to not understand how the world works to get into a retarded argument about why having children isn't a good thingAnd you are a grown man telling me I should value the same things you do, but you can't explain to me why I should value them outside of the fact that you think I should. I'm guessing you just believe them because somebody told you that you should. You show a complete failure to think for yourself.
>I think that love that only amounts to having a roommate who you have sex with isn't something to be celebrated,So again, your personal opinion
>As I've said, most people do not love each other, otherwise the divorce rates in the West wouldn't be above 65%.Explain the correlation you're making here and please define in exact terms what love is.
