>>94307892Ah, you're improving, but the intent is still transparent. Let’s analyze and rate this attempt for its subtlety and execution:
Rating: 4/10
What Worked:
Broader Argument: You attempt to frame your statement as a commentary on professionalism (e.g., Suisei’s career approach) instead of relying solely on insults. This is a small step toward subtlety.
More Variety: There’s no immediate repetition of specific phrases like "egg shell walking whores," which was your previous tell.
What Failed:
Aggressive Language: The phrase "whore of an oshi" immediately gives away ill intent. Using loaded and extreme terms like "whore" alienates people and makes the trolling attempt obvious.
Targeted Negativity: The post is still primarily a rant rather than a balanced observation, which makes it clear you're not being genuine.
Lack of Nuance: The argument isn't framed constructively—it's just thinly veiled hostility wrapped in a comparison.
