>>9501008I'd love to see them mess with terraria more, as most of the people I've spotted streaming it are literal whos that I can't stand more than five minutes of, but I accept that it's structure being much more in favor of being played as a game you complete instead of a building toy and requiring more focus such that it can't be treated as a glorified zatsudan (and the limits of users per map, and the inability to skin the player model into themselves, and so forth) render it unfavorable for the purposes for which the miney crafts are favored.
regardless, OP, you're a faggot and should commit An Hero.
>>9501836ark is another one that wants more to be a game you progress through than a sandbox you dick around in. even with jeb and dinnerbong trying to make minecraft into the combat-centered MMO they want to make but MS won't let them, it stays far more suitable to freeform screwing around.
>>9502617>>9502329inferior to what? comparing across genres is unreasonable. it is a game relatively sufficient at what it tries to be, a weird mashup of metroidvania and block-by-block building game in two dimensions. minecraft attempts to be a block based constructive sandbox with some combat stapled on (originally because notch felt like it and nowadays because jeb and dinnerbong want to make a different kind of game but aren't allowed to) in a three dimensional, functionally infinite world, and is generally unmatched in success as such a game.
if you want to go on that it's "inferior" to something, find something that's trying to do the same thing.
and the moogle from FF6 isn't a verb, learn to speak, you stupid underageb&.
