>>9663611>>9663611He never threatened to take down a charity stream. Everyone upset at this guy is a double digit IQ mongoloid. He said that because it is a charity stream he WON'T take it down. Quite literally the opposite of what you said.
>>9665346He 100% could have DMCAd the stream if he wanted too. If you disagree then you have to also believe that his songs were not infringing on cover's IP and they couldn't DMCA him either.
I don't understand how some of you morons think that infringing on someone's IP gives them ownership over your work. It doesn't. It just means you can't monetize your work. They can't monetize your work either.
And Cover's guidelines are only applicable if they follow law. Some of you would think Yagoo could murder anyone he wants if it was in the guidelines.