>>96637707that's not what that post said. That post wasn't talking about an oshi and their specific personal success. They said
>we (as in, the general fanbase) don't need a new gen (not related to a specific oshi at all, referring to an entire gen that doesn't exist yet) when justice (referring to an entire gen, not an oshi) fails to get numbersit's not about a personal concern for their oshi's success, it's appealing to numbers as an abstractly valuble thing in and of themselves and speaking on behalf of the fanbase as if the general fanbase is concerned with the wins and losses of gens in the way a shareholder would be or something. It is literally not about being invested in your own oshi's success at all.
Why the fuck do so many anons respond to questions by repeating catchphrases that are not about what is being asked and don't even follow on? Stop doing that, it makes you seem unintelligent
>>96637711>nta but [thing that doesn't answer the question and is a completely different unrelated reason why you, an anon who wasn't asked, doesn't want another]why the fuck do so many anons post like this? Stop doing that, it makes you seem unintelligent
