>>97615524To play the Devil's Advocate for a bit
>I think this is too convoluted and overthinking itIna mentioned that Temari has convoluted timelines and that we'll just have to guess on some parts because while it references things, it also brings in new things.
>all being Inas from other timelines and stuffsIIRC Lumina implied two Inas (Violet and Temari existing as separate timelines involved in the Temari MV) but you're right in that the other girls don't have any proof of being "alternate Ina's" too, especially with Lumina also saying ONLY the two timelines are involved. At most you have the flower pairings and each girl vaguely resembling a young version of Ina's various outfits.
>There's also not necessarily a reason to think that Violet timeline Ina has the same background as Temari InaThere isn't really outside of Ina saying that "Violet is the framework for Temari and Meconopsis". There are tons of parallels between Violet and Temari too but they may have different meanings
>her takofied form is a result of the Temari ritual shenanigans when it already has an explanation with her debut lore.Rereading her lore, it does just say Ina "picked up a book and poof became a Priestess with tentacles". The Inaverse doesn't really contradict that so far, and with lumina saying that Ina became a god in Temari despite no physical changes (despite having them at the start and end of the MV) it's been a pretty big research subject as to why.
>Meconopsis bad endingMeconopsis isn't a bad ending. It's specifically the ending where Ina overcomes AO-chan and chooses the love of her friends and family. It's just that the song direction was inspired by Myth's Bad End, not that it was actually a bad end. Also there have been people posting comparisons showing "ritual symbols" in Violet too, albeit far less dramatic.
Basically Ina is Scott Cawthon and we are looking at purple blobs for breakthroughs.
