>>98068301>you aren't "providing a pathway to sustainable content creation"i do not believe you are comprehending the conversation anymore
i reposted your earlier posts so you can reread you own words
you asked why i said there were only two major successful avenues for sustainable content creation, i laid out the currently observable, empirical evidence, which you then proceeded to discount without any logical basis, but an emotional one
i get that you want there to be more ways for vtubers to express themselves and make a profession, but honestly, its rare that a profession gets two different avenues to sustain a living and to even have nuance between them for personal identity
lets take acting for example, we are going to ignore broadway acting as it's again, an unsustainable profession that relies on some other financial source
as an actor, you have a choice between making money through entertainment, or advertisements
these are the two most effective ways to live as an actor
inside these, you can have nuances where you can be a stand in or an extra, i would separate being a stunt double due to the how difficult it is to keep that job and the major health risks that impact it long term making it unsustainable
the point is, you can't live as an actor if you aren't regularly making money, the same as vtubing
inside of acting, there are further nuances between being a comic relief or being a character actor, these nuances exist in vtubing as well, but they are nuances, not the main context of the acting profession itself
the real argument you are making is
>why does everything have to be one or the other, i dont want it to be like that so i deny that it existsand i cant help you on something you arrived at emotionally instead of logically
