>>98689024It's usually from a guy who got it from a guy who got it from a guy who got it from a guy... probably traded 10 more times before we arrive at the initial distributor.
And if they aren't retarded, they're masking their IP, so it would be impossible to report them to the police, anyway, especially if you're not getting it first-hand.
In terms of quantified moral harm caused by the average mostly-invisible consumer who has 0 ties to the producer, it's so negligible that there is an element of undue weight blinding everyone's sense of judgement.
You are technically causing more harm by buying snacks every day, and thus actively contributing to the child obesity pandemic by funding junk food industries. You just don't get outraged about it because buying a snack is normalized, legal and commonly percieved as harmless.
>>98689289What's your argument, even? The whole point of my post was that opponents of 'p can't muster up a single rational argument, and you've just proven it by hurling an insult rather than addressing anything I've said.
Also, pedophiles wouldn't touch "normal drugs" and would go straight to the "hard drugs" with no clear transition, so your analogy doesn't even work.
