>>99425550Which is a pretty valid assumption to make.
> that means Sinder isn't responsibleYes she is. If she wasn't aware of what her manager, her single employee, was doing, that's gross negligence. If a hospital hires a doctor and the doctor for years was harming patients, yes the doctor is responsible, but so is the hospital.
If you empower someone to act on your behalf, you own their actions. And there's no reason to believe, based on the screenshots where they constantly use 'we' and Sinder doesn't seem to object to anything Red is saying, that Sinder is fully supportive and aware of what he is doing.
>The entire doc is Sinder's managerClearly you didn't read the doc since there's screenshots of Sinder echoing scarily similar sentiments.
>Until we have Red and Sinders side, you don't have enough information to say anything definitiveAnd yet you are here definitively saying this is a witchhunt created by a dumb ESL, you're a hypocrite and you're most likely either Red, Sinder or a lackey running damage control
