>>99901994>it's muh capitalism againNo it isn’t. Especially since the definition of "capitalism" is so arbitrary, everyone has their own definition, and the definition by leftists is usually some vague "when companies exist". What they mean with companies is usually that they think of the big monopolies, but what they don’t realize is that monopolies are in opposition of the free market, which is actually what capitalism is. A perfect free market society has substitutes for every product or service, so if one supplier does a bad job, people can change to a different one, keeping them in check automatically because they directly lose customers by doing something worse.
Communists are wrong for just blanket applying "capitalism" on our western societies when it’s more like a spectrum between collectivist monopolies and individualistic markets.
So what this means in this case is that if the people in a free market society, who are together because of freedom of association, simply do not want immigrants, they can just decide not to. But that’s not how our societies are like, we are forced to accept these people because we don’t have freedom of association, because we don’t live in a free market, this is entirely a governmental problem imposed upon us because the government doesn’t rely on market mechanisms of supply and demand.
You WILL pay taxes whether you like it or not, and WILL be susceptible to laws whether you voted for them or not, and in that way they fundamentally differ from private companies which you can choose not to engage with. We are in this problem because of governments, not "capitalism".