>>1891705...this version of the image? I guess it's a question of saturation, but even though I tried tinkering with it myself, I didn't manage to reproduce the hue I want. My attempts just looked kinda off. Alternately one might try to detext the second version using the first, but I suspect that'd be much more work and therefore a silly way to go about it.
I want to print the picture on a mousepad and think the result is going to look better with the more vibrant hue.
