>>1834665Definitely not a troll. Why would you even think that?
Applied sharpening filters several times and maximized contrast.
If that's not good enough I'll have to admit defeat.
(Of course, if you like it, I'd appreciate your saying so. I'll assume silence means 'no')
>>1834684 might be right. Either a render so you can supply your own background or a total replacement so there's no question of trying to match a small sample of someone else's technique. 